Why judges seem to an appointed counsel to represent you frown?

question from David L : Why do judges seem to an appointed counsel to represent you StirnrunzelnWarum judges frown on the ADA as a private attorney about it? I have recently returned from a ADA to a private attorney, because they do not look like the ADA really had my interests in the hand while talking with the DA with my private attorney, things seem easier. Is there a preference for judges and D.A? If so, why Best Answer:

response from Nevet
Think about it for 10 days Sekunden.Jeden the judge dealt with the ADA and observed him “try” to make a fair case for people who stink to be obvious guilt. A lawyer who really believes that his client is guilty, may drop the case (as would happen if the debt was involved, a flat bank account). The ADA does not really have a choice. He ends up spending much of his time with the best case he can make on the name of an obviously guilty.

Enter below your answer to this question!

One thought on “Why judges seem to an appointed counsel to represent you frown?

  1. There isn’t. The judge and the DA do not care who is representing you. The attorney, however, will doubtlessly put more time and effort into the case of a paying client, rather than a pro bono representation. Lawyers are assigned “legal aid” cases on a rotating basis, much like wrecker services in rural areas get rotating call for accidents.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>